September 25, 2011

Remembering Jane

Remembering Jane
I will always love Jane Austen. But I have to admit that her books are not always as easy to read as some of today's contemporary novels. I believe due to the usage of the Old English language. And this one is not an exception. It had to lay on my shelf for a year.


Emma (1815)
by Jane Austen

Emma tells the story of Emma Woodhouse—a beautiful, clever, rich young lady who entails herself never to marry. She thinks highly of herself, particularly her match-making skills that it blinded her to see her friend Harriet's feelings, as well as her own.

Full of witty lines, and hilarious twists and turns, Emma was such a fun read (I cannot help but imagine Clueless, a film loosely based on the novel which starred Paul Rudd and Alicia Silverstone).  I did like Pride and Prejudice more than this one, though. Nonetheless, both share the right amount of brilliance and entertainment. Emma, though a bit silly and stubborn, still showed a great deal of firmness in her beliefs.


I lay it down as a general rule, Harriet, that if a woman doubts as to whether she should accept a man or not, she certainly ought to refuse him.

That's what I like most about Austen's novels: her heroines. They have their odd characteristics too, but they are almost always unafraid to show their true selves regardless of what society imposes. Considering the customs of proposal and marriage (in relation to the importance of social status) during her time, Austen writes without fear of society's judgment. She creates characters with wit and strong convictions; further bending the conventional image of women during her period. 

In her novels, women are admired because of their intelligence, and they rebel against society's banalities; while men are not only liked because of their social status. There is, of course, other factors, and enough chemistry and romance that would balance the contradictions. Likewise, despite of Austen's seeming fondness of creating male and female protagonists with huge age gap, the development of the relationship remains rational, and with justified conclusion.

(c)

September 5, 2011

Rocket Science

Rocket Science
I have not seen any film for a week or two now, but it felt like years. Not watching movies is like not eating anything healthy or delicious. It is depriving. And this one's a good starter.

A Jeffrey Blitz film

Hal Hefner, a 15-year high school student who has a terrible stutter, struggles to get over troubles at home as he joins his school's debate team.



Hal is not only having a hard time at home, but also a hard time speaking. He finds it difficult to say things on his mind, even answering simple questions about his daily food preferences (fish or pizza, answer me!). But his life started to change when a beautiful classmate asked him to join the debate team. Of course, he eventually falls for her. But this is not a love story.

The narrative was simple, but definitely entertaining. In the most realest way possible, high school kids are actually portrayed and appeared like normal high school kids. But aside from its naturally interesting plot, the actors, particularly the 'debaters' gave such outstanding performances you would root even for the story's antagonist. Anna Kendrick was sensational. While Reece Thompson has undeniably won my heart. With such a lovely soundtrack (singing "That's why I love the unknown."), effortless-like narrative, and pretty awesome characters, Rocket Science easily captivates its viewers' hearts. Sharing its own kind of flavor, it is a coming-of-age film worthy to be seen.